Private Notes on Gary Becker

Heckman / 2014-05-13 / 조회: 13,025

* 이 글은 노벨경제학 수상자인 Jim Heckman 교수가 영면한 노벨경제학자인 게리베커에 대해 쓴 글 입니다. 자세한 내용은 첨부된 PDF 파일을 참조하십시오.


Private Notes on

Gary Becker


James J. Heckman
The University of Chicago

 

 

I have been asked to talk about Gary Becker this evening. This is a daunting task in light of the volumes of essays written about the man and his work, some of them by distinguished guests in this room.
Moreover, it is made all the more dificult by the remarks made by Milton Friedman some 10 years ago when he spoke about Gary Becker at a faculty-wide award ceremony that recognized Gary as an outstanding contributor to intellectual life of the university over the long haul - the Phoenix Award.

Friedman said, unequivocally,
“Gary Becker is the Greatest Social Scientist Who Has Lived and Worked in the Last Half Century."
That pretty much says it all, and I agree with this statement.
So what can I add to this and all of the other praise heaped upon Gary Becker over the years? Since his work is so well known and so much discussed, it seems dificult to contribute much to what people know about it, and that may well prove to be true.
But as a member of the crowd in many past celebrations, I have not always agreed with the statements made about Gary or the de-scription of his work, and this is my chance to cast Gary Becker in a somewhat different light than many have done in earlier talks.
I noted few attempts to tie together the continuities in his life and work, something I will attempt to do this evening. I also want to cast him correctly as an empirical economic scientist, who has created important bodies of economic theory and has launched and guided a massive body of empirical research in economics.

At my own peril, I will revise previous descriptions and show how his life is the manifestation of unique personality and intellectual traits that have persisted over his adult life.
I do so ignoring the warnings of George Stigler, who, when re-viewing a history of economic thought by Lionel Robbins, wrote in response to his own question,
“What relevance have the details of a man's personal life to the nature of his scientic work?"
the remark:
“I am tempted to answer: biography distorts rather than illuminates the understanding of scientific work." - Stigler (1970)
I will not get into too many personal details, except where they are relevant or interesting.
He has an interesting personal life, is a power hitter, a man of much personal and intellectual strength. Unknown to most of you, he has a secret life as a body builder and champion athlete | but I will not dwell much on that aspect tonight.
His sister Natalie tells me that Gary was very athletically inclined and pursued a lot of sports - handball and stickball.

....(하략)


       

▲ TOP

NO. 제 목 글쓴이 등록일자
158 무역의 역사로부터 배우지 못하는 이유
Carmen Elena Dorobăț / 2018-04-09
Carmen Elena Dorobăț 2018-04-09
157 경이로운 시장의 재화 분배방식
T. Norman Van Cott / 2018-04-09
T. Norman Van Cott 2018-04-09
156 커민스 엔진 회사가 기업가들에게 주는 교훈
Michael R. Strain / 2018-04-06
Michael R. Strain 2018-04-06
155 독점적인 빅테크 그러나 소비자에게는 합리적
Michael R. Strain / 2018-04-05
Michael R. Strain 2018-04-05
154 코뿔소를 지키려면 뿔 거래를 합법화하라.
Sam Dunkovich / 2018-04-04
Sam Dunkovich 2018-04-04
153 철강 산업 일자리의 감소는 생산성 증가 때문이지 수입 철강 때문이 아닙니다
Mark J. Perry / 2018-04-03
Mark J. Perry 2018-04-03
152 카메룬 중소기업 소유주들에게 자율권을 주다
Atlas Network / 2018-04-02
Atlas Network 2018-04-02
151 트럼프의 철강관세 – 미국 우선주의가 맞는가?
Brian Balfour / 2018-03-30
Brian Balfour 2018-03-30
150 온타리오의 왕위 연설은 성장과 경쟁력을 무시한다
Ben Eisen / 2018-03-29
Ben Eisen 2018-03-29
149 자본주의가 가장 페미니스트적 시스템이다
Tim Worstall / 2018-03-28
Tim Worstall 2018-03-28
148 반평등적, 반여성적 사회주의의 기원
Chelsea Follett / 2018-03-27
Chelsea Follett 2018-03-27
147 스타벅스의 보상 체계는 블록체인 방식의 전자화폐를 위한 더 큰 계획의 일부이다.
Jennifer Faull / 2018-03-26
Jennifer Faull 2018-03-26
146 폴 크루그먼에게 보내는 무역에 대한 찬사
Claude Barfield / 2018-03-23
Claude Barfield 2018-03-23
145 자학적 상처, 트럼프의 관세
Patrick Tyrrell, Anthony B. Kim / 2018-03-22
Patrick Tyrrell, Anthony B. Kim 2018-03-22
144 세금 인하로 인해 미국 중소기업들이 또 다시 움직이다
Chris Stansbury / 2018-03-22
Chris Stansbury 2018-03-22