[Op-Ed] Book Price Regulation Hinders the Expansion of Reading Culture

The fixed book price system is producing negative outcomes for both consumers and suppliers

A full-scale review is needed to pursue the sustainability of Korea’s publishing industry and broaden the base of reading culture

The fixed book price system is producing results that differ from the original expectation that it would play a positive role in Korean society. Introduced with the aim of protecting the earnings of authors and publishers by keeping book prices at a certain level, this system is instead working to the disadvantage of readers, publishers, and bookstores alike. Contrary to its stated purpose of improving economic accessibility and creating an environment in which books are easier to access, the fixed book price system is distorting the market, increasing the burden on consumers, and threatening the overall sustainability of the publishing industry.

The fixed book price system shifts the burden of price increases onto existing readers, reducing social utility. In a normal market, when demand falls, prices decline and a natural equilibrium price is formed. This is a basic market principle: supply and demand come into balance, allowing consumers to purchase goods at reasonable prices.

However, the fixed book price system obstructs the formation of an equilibrium price. When consumers are forced to pay more than they otherwise would because book prices are fixed, their willingness to buy naturally declines. The utility people derive from books may differ from person to person, but a regulation requiring everyone to pay at least a certain price shifts the burden onto readers. This goes beyond a simple personal issue and has become a factor hindering the expansion of reading culture.

When prices are fixed, consumers inevitably become more cautious in making purchasing decisions. As a result, the fixed book price system, introduced to stabilize the reading ecosystem, has instead led to a decline in the social utility generated by books. For publishers and bookstores, meanwhile, it undermines financial stability by aggravating the problem of oversupply.

In principle, high prices increase supply and reduce demand. When that results in excess supply, sellers can dispose of inventory through price reductions such as discounts. However, because the government has uniformly restricted discount rates, publishers have been prevented even from using such strategies.

Unsold inventory becomes a direct burden on publishers, and long-term inventory adversely affects the financial stability of the publishing industry. By blocking the market’s self-correcting mechanism through the fixed book price system, publishers have seen profitability worsen, and the publishing ecosystem has lost its dynamism.

Small publishers and independent bookstores with limited financial resources find it even harder to prepare for such risks. As a result, publishers face constraints in releasing new books and producing distinctive content. In trying to avoid leftover inventory, they end up publishing only popular books, making it harder to publish non-mainstream literature or books with scholarly value. A system that should protect authors and publishers and encourage the production of diverse content is in fact producing distorted outcomes.

Another problem is that it raises barriers to entry for consumers and restricts their choices. The price fixing under the fixed book price system does not guarantee an appropriate balance between supply and demand; rather, it functions as a kind of hurdle that limits book purchases themselves.

Consumers have the right to enjoy a range of choices across diverse content. However, when content is priced above what consumers are willing to pay, book buyers are driven to other markets. In an era in which books compete with many other forms of cultural content such as films, music, and digital media, fixing only book prices inevitably places the book market at a disadvantage.

Consumers in the digital age in particular are accustomed to making purchases by comparing prices and taking advantage of discounts. Books, by contrast, having lost price flexibility, are perceived as content that is even less accessible, thereby limiting the inflow of new readers.

Even among existing readers, those without much financial room—such as university students and teenagers—are giving up on buying books or turning instead to rental or used-book services. A regulation that removes any room for price compromise only for books is a clear form of discrimination against the book and cultural industry. There is ample reason to see this as restricting not only current consumers but also the freedom of potential consumers.

In conclusion, the fixed book price system, contrary to the social values it originally sought to promote, is producing negative results for both consumers and suppliers. Government regulation that fixes book prices above appropriate market levels reduces readers’ willingness to buy, makes it harder to publish a diverse range of new titles, and undermines the vitality of the publishing industry as a whole.

Consumers are steadily losing their ability to make rational choices, while publishers and bookstores are losing their capacity for self-reliance. This reality demonstrates that the fixed book price system has failed to achieve its original purpose. Diversity in publishing culture and the protection of the rights and interests of producers and consumers cannot be achieved through uniform regulations such as price controls. In light of the demands of the times, a full-scale review of the fixed book price system would be the first step toward ensuring the sustainability of Korea’s publishing industry and broadening the base of reading culture.

Hansle Kim, Intern Researcher, Center for Free Enterprise (CFE)

---

Original title: [칼럼] 도서정가제, 독서문화 저변 확대에 방해 요인으로 작용

Author: Han-seul Kim

Date: 2025-01-08

Source: https://www.cfe.org/bbs/bbsDetail.php?cid=free_opinion&idx=27250